Main

media and culture Archives

June 27, 2004

"It's not a question of how long I live, but it's a question of how well I live"

This is a post I've been cogitating on for a while.

Ray Charles was a singer I grew up with. I can't remember a time when I wasn't familiar with his music--he was one of those artists my brother, sister, and I referred to by first name only. His versions of "Hit the Road, Jack" and "You Are My Sunshine" were two particular favorites of my childhood; later, it was "Georgia" and "Unchain My Heart"; in college, "Am I Blue" and "Come Rain or Come Shine." Now, as I'm writing this, "Old Man River" and "Oh, What a Beautiful Morning" seem particularly poignant.

His vocal stylings and ground-breaking arrangements of classic songs alone made him someone to be remembered--forever, hopefully. But his outward appearance added to his art; his full enjoyment of life was expressed in particular in his brilliant smile. CMT has been showing repeats of a Crossroads with Ray Charles and Travis Tritt. At on point, Charles is so delighted that Tritt wants to do a particular song that he rears back on his bench at the keyboard, feet off the ground, head back, huge grin on his face, clapping his hands with joy. At 72 years old, he still experienced--and showed--the pure rapture of a three year-old.

I spent a semester in Paris in the fall of 2002--there were posters up everywhere advertising Charles's impending concert there. I wanted to go, but it didn't work out. Add one to my list of concerts I wish I could have seen.

June 28, 2004

All nerdy colleges are nerdy in the same way

There's much to blog, but since I now know that there are some Swatties reading, I wanted to rush this post to the presses.

One of the books I'm currently reading is Margaret Atwood's newest, Oryx and Crake. It takes place sometime in the future, and describes where one of the main characters (a genius) goes to college:

"Watson-Crick was known to the students there as Asperger's U. because of the high percentage of brilliant weirdos that strolled and hopped and lurched through its corridors. Demi-autistic, genetically speaking; single-track tunnel-vision minds, a market degree of social ineptitude--these were not your sharp dressers--and luckily for everyone there, a high tolerance for mildly deviant public behaviour." (p. 194)

Though graduating has greatly softened my feeling toward it, this passage still reminds me of my alma mater.

June 30, 2004

They beat me to it

CNN (and other news outlets) are reporting that the Pentagon is activating up to 5,600 rarely-used reservists from the Individual Ready Reserves. The DoD's official website provides this definition of the IRR:

Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), a manpower pool in the Ready Reserve, primarily consists of: Individuals who have had training, have served previously in the Active component or the Selected Reserve, and have some period of a military obligation remaining. IRR members are in an active status, but do not perform regularly scheduled training.

Sgt. Stryker clears up some myths and Blackfive blasts the media for reporting military matters, such as this one, inaccurately.

Finally, Cox and Forkum, my favorite editorial cartoonists, have a sweet and funny cartoon on the subject.

July 4, 2004

Let Freedom Ring

LetFreedomRing-X.gif


From Cox and Forkum Editorial Cartoons

July 7, 2004

The American dream

This story (from the NY Times!) reminds us that, elsewhere, the United States is seen as the pinnacle of freedom, a place where hard work allows one to live the good life: For Bantu Refugees, Hard-Won American Dreams.

"In Somalia, I dreamed of the United States, even though I didn't know anything about it," Mr. Edow said, speaking through a translator like the other Bantu adults interviewed. America represents opportunity, Bantu refugees say [...]

Mr. Edow and Ms. Idle are part of a continuing resettlement of 13,000 Bantu people from Somalia, descendants of people kidnapped from southern Africa by Arab slave traders two centuries ago. As part of one of the most ambitious relocations of political refugees by the United States in recent history, the Bantu couple arrived in Tucson in May 2003 from a Kenyan camp. They were uneducated, unemployed and unfamiliar with basic facts of American life like electrical appliances and indoor plumbing.

Now Mr. Edow and Ms. Idle drive themselves to work in their own car, a Ford Escort they bought in September. They shop at 99-cent stores. They pay the $635 rent for their three-bedroom apartment. The children, a 15-year-old and two 8-year-olds, are in school, earning good grades and, like other Bantu children, school officials say, outperforming the general student population. Mr. Edow is saving money to buy a house.

"Every month I pay rent," he said, sitting in his kitchen with a bare foot propped on his seat, a cellphone in his hand and a videotape of "Shrek" entertaining his children in the next room. "It's good to own a house. It belongs to you."

Mr. Edow, who could not read numbers a year ago, knows what a down payment is. In May, he applied for a green card, celebrating his application with a red, white and blue cake.

July 10, 2004

The U.S. Constitution and American achievement

I visited Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center with a friend today. The Center is a government-funded institution

dedicated to increasing public understanding of, and appreciation for, the Constitution, its history, and its contemporary relevance, through an interactive, interpretive facility within Independence National Historical Park and a program of national outreach, so that We the People may better secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

I have a great deal of respect for the Constitution, as well as admiration for the men who created it. The development and applications of the U.S. Constitution fascinate meâ€"constitutional law has been one of my favorite subjects since high schoolâ€"so I was really looking forward to seeing what kind of experience the Center would offer.

The building that houses the Center is a modern design, and was just completed in 2003. While the design is not quite as awe-inspiring as I might wish a monument to the Constitution would be, it is still aesthetically pleasing, with lots of glass and, on the outside, an inscription of the preamble in large, recognizable script. While the bulk of the Center is taken up by illustrations of exactly how each section of the Constitution came to be, the entrance into the main exhibit is what I wish to meditate on here.

Continue reading "The U.S. Constitution and American achievement" »

July 11, 2004

The Constitution Center, part 2

Today, I thought of detail about the Constitution Center that I didn't include in yesterday's post.

The Center is organized in a circle; in the center is the theater where the initial presentation takes place; the walk-through exhibit goes around the theater, on the second floor. Close to the end of the walk-through section, there is a small board on the wall; a desk sits below with a few pads of post-it notes and those miniature-golf mini pencils. The board asks, "Is there too much government, just enough, or not enough?" and encourages visitors to post their responses. Visitors before us had posted a number of different responses, over half of which were variants of "too much" (e.g., "too much bureacracy" and "one useless bureaucrat is one too many").

I was surprised by this percentage, even as I wrote my own response ("too much!"). But, having been a poli sci major, and having taken a statistics class, I pointed this out to my friend and asked if she thought it was just because people who would answer "too much" would be more likely to answer this question. People who like the status quo, I thought, wouldn't feel the need to express themselves as strongly as those who don't, and people who desire more government usually see it as wanting different kinds of government--different programs--and not "more."

My friend said she thought it was the case that people who think there's too much government are the kind of people who are more likely to visit the a center devoted to the Constitution.

She's right, I think. Given that, what does it mean that the people who are invested in learning about and promoting the Constitution--the most important document in U.S. law--are also those who believe that there is too much of a government presence in our lives?

Actually, I know what I think it means. Unfortunately, I have nothing but anecdotal evidence to support it, and there are many ways of refuting my hypothesis. (One way, off the top of my head, would be to cite the track records of Supreme Court justices who are identified as "textualists," "originalists," or "strict constructionists"--for example, Antonin Scalia--who claim that their intepretations of the Constitution adhere most closely to the words/true meaning of the document, yet support prayer in public schools.)

In any case, it got me thinking...just one of the many research projects/books I'd like to pursue/write some day.

July 22, 2004

Philly events

How much do I want to go to these?

August 6th: For the Common Defense: Tommy Franks on War in the 21st Century

September 11th: Toby Keith at the Tweeter Center

Anybody want to go? Anyone?

...Bueller?

July 29, 2004

Mo' media, mo' problems

Charles at lgf points out Reuters' sloppy journalism:

...concluding [the article] with this blatant editorializing, calling on unnamed “commentators” and “political analysts” who always seem to back up the al-Reuters editorial slant:

"Many commentators question the wisdom of pushing ahead with the vote with stability so fragile, but political analysts say the U.S. administration needs a foreign policy success story ahead of President Bush’s re-election bid in November."

Indeed, who are these "commentators" and "political analysts"? It's all well and good to ask people of this ilk to comment on an incident, but their input should be phrased in the form of,

John Doe of XYZ institute commented, "direct quote."

My college newspaper's guidelines on the subject were very clear, and we were held to this standard. Why isn't a huge, ostensibly well-respected organization doing the same?

From a different angle

To get more to the substance of the article I referred to in the post below, Blackfive writes about his personal experience with Doctors Without Borders:

The SF Soldiers devised a way to have the Kurdish mothers help with the medical care of their children. The DWB doctors did not want to show the Kurdish women how to care for the sick because they had been threatened by the fathers. In Kurdish culture, the husband/father must teach the wife/mother how to do everything. No one else is allowed to teach her - if you tried, you would probably get shot or stabbed. And the DWB doctors would rather let the children die than address the problem of having the mothers learn to prevent and stop Cholera.

August 17, 2004

Heh.

Kerry Unveils One-Point Plan for a Better America

"My national-defense policy will be guided by one imperative: Don't be George Bush. As will my plans to create a strong economy, protect civil rights, develop a better healthcare system, and improve homeland security."

Heehee.

(It's The Onion, folks.)

August 26, 2004

Sibelius's Karelia Suite

When I was 13 or 14, my mother subscribed to a season's worth of tickets to the county philharmonic. I grew up studying classical modern dance with teachers who often chose classical music for practicing or performing, so I had some basic appreciation of the genre, but not much more than your average Top 40-favoring adolescent. During the second of the season's concerts, I listened with eyes drooping from the soothing sounds of the orchestra, which failed to arouse much of my interest. But, during the last piece, I suddenly found myself focusing intensely on the melody played by a mournful English horn. About seven minutes later, the piece ended in an achingly seeking cello theme, and I realized I had tears in my eyes.

This was my introduction to Jean Sibelius; the piece was his tone-poem "The Swan of Tuonela," from Lemminkäinen Suite. For Christmas, I requested a CD of the piece, and thus became quite familiar with his Symphony No. 1 and Violin Concerto in D minor, Op. 47, and less familiar with his second symphony.

While I would name Sibelius as one of my favorite composers, it was not until a few weeks ago that I decided to explore more of his work. I purchased a double CD of Symphonies 1, 4, 5, and 6, and the Karelia Suite, performed by the Berliner Philharmoniker and conducted by Herbert von Karajan (it's amazing how cheap even imported, quality classical music can be). I specifically bought this CD because a member of the forums at Objectivism Online compared Sibelius's 5th Symphony to Ayn Rand's description of Richard Halley's "Concerto of Deliverance" in Atlas Shrugged.

My preferred method of "getting to know" classical music is to play it in the background as I go about my business, then, once familiarized with it on a basic level, I return to those sections that I have found the most captivating. This is the method I decided to use for listening to Symphony No. 5, so I have been playing the CD pretty much every time I sit down at the computer for the last few weeks. The first three tracks of this volume are actually Sibelius's Karelia Suite, Op. 11, and just a few days ago, I realized that the Ballade, the hauntingly beautiful second movement, had caught my ear. It begins with a quiet, distinctive melody played low in the horn section, then picked up by the strings, and punctuated by woodwinds. Almost-unceasing cellos play a steady undercurrent, granting the movement a steady momentum through the false ending about halfway through the seven-minute section. After a few moments of near silence, middle-range strings (I'm very bad at identifying instruments) pick up the initial theme. I find it very hard to describe the emotions evoked by this transition, so I'll do it in a way that seems trite, but fairly accurate. It sounds like part of a soundtrack directly following a battle sceneâ€"when the heroes look around and see that, while many have died, they, the forces of good, have triumphed. It would be appropriate in Band of Brothers.

The piece continues contemplatively, and about five minutes in, the full string section enters, evoking rejuvenating sunshine. Another false ending, and a single woodwind enters: the voice of the hero. The only disappointing part is the ending, which fades out with little recollection of the quiet grandeur of the rest of the movement. There is a final movement in the Suite that is heroic and joyful, but it is the second that really catches my ear with its dramatic push toward victory won, even at a high cost.

Of course, I am no music expert, and in fact my interpretation is quite different from that in the liner notes, which describes the Ballade as "the singing of a medieval Finnish minstrel with a melancholy singing tune for strings." But, Sibelius has not disappointed me yet, and I would recommend his music to anyone inclined toward the Romantic tradition.

Feel free to leave your classical music suggestions in the comments!

September 10, 2004

Ayn Rand sighting

Or, hearing, to be precise.

Imagine my surprise this morning when I turned on NPR and heard, "...Ayn Rand argued the value of such buildings..." etc, followed by a clip of unmistakable dialogue.

Then the program ended. It was Marketplace Morning Report, and the feature was called "Trophy Buildings"â€"go here to listen to it on Real Player, as I did to get the full scoop.

Essentially, with the three-year anniversary of Sept. 11, Marketplace was asking questions about the real estate prospects of so-called "trophy buildings," such as the Citigroup Building in New York.

At the beginning, the feature included a clip from the film The Fountainhead of Gail Wynand describing his lifelong vision of the Wynand Building: "It will be the tallest building in New York...a monument to my life."

It ended with (paraphrased):

Ayn Rand argued the value of such buildings over half a century ago in The Fountainhead. [roll clip]
[Wynand] "This will be the last skyscraper ever built in New York, the last achievement of man on earth before mankind destroys itself."
[Roark] "Mankind will never destroy iteself, Mr. Wynand, nor should it think of itself as destroyed so long as it does things such as this."
[Wynand] "As what?"
[Roark] "As the Wynand building."

The feature ended there. Pretty cool, huh?

About media and culture

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to ...to say the 'I' in the media and culture category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

Marines is the previous category.

politics is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31